The debates and differences of opinion regarding offside are as old as soccer, and
they beg the question of why the points of view diverge so greatly. The reason lies
within the Law itself, although it is very clear and unambiguous in theory.
The law gives the referee a great deal of latitude in the interpretation of the game
situation, which means that the referee must always be aware of his responsibility
in judging an offside position. That is to say, the referee must look at the facts
and not theorize.
Please note that Law XI is a protective law. A player may be in an offside position
again and again, but the referee may not caution him - only an indirect free kick
may be awarded.
The difficulty in interpreting the offside law is that the referee must simultaneously
evaluate the positions of a number of players located at varying distances from him
which constitutes a problem of perspective. It is clear from the text of the Law
that the offside judgement must be made at the moment the ball is (touched or) played,
at which time the player in question may be 50 and more yards from the referee.
For that reason, the referee - and the assistant referee - are allowed a certain
period of hesitation to determine where the ball is going and whether there is any
visible interference with play by the player in the offside position. If there is
no interference, then this is a case of passive offside, which should not be punished.
In this regard, we must examine more closely two systems that can be of decisive
importance in the evaluation of offside positions:
Re 1: In this case the referee exercises a monitoring function, i.e., control
is better than blind acceptance. If, as a result of the assistant referee’s flag
for offside, there are a number of reactions (players, team officials, spectators)
or if the assistant referees appear to be performing poorly, it will be necessary
for the referee to alter his area of patrol and - several times - visually monitor
the decisions of his colleague. It would be patently wrong to support obviously wrong
decisions out of a sense of “camaraderie.”
The responsibilities of the assistant referee on offside:
To express it differently, the assistant referee should always keep the next-to-last
defender level with his right shoulder; permanently maintaining this imaginary line
(constantly staying with the defender) indicates that the assistant referee is actively
doing his job. An assistant referee who stands at one spot demonstrates as little
activity as a referee whose sphere of action is in the center circle.
It is the responsibility of the assistant referee to never underestimate anything
connected with offside. Indeed, working on the line requires constant concentration
and understanding of what is going on in the game.
Re 2: The referee can not always be level with the next-to-last defender, just to
cover the responsibilities of the nonexistent official assistant referee.
But he can through good positioning and running - quickly crossing the midfield;
not waiting around at the spot of a foul when the restart is being made by the defending
team; not running with his head down - improve significantly his view of offside
positions.
He can also make a number of problems with offside for himself by not having a clear
field of view: his sight being blocked by players, by watching the ball in flight
instead of looking ahead to the spot where it should land, and by not running the
diagonal that will assure him a better view.
During a direct shot on gaol, only the referee can decide whether or not there is
interference with play by a player in an offside position. Here, too, an appropriate
wait is always useful.
Offside on a direct free kick can only occur if an attacker in an offside position
interferes with the goalkeeper by letting the ball run past or by interfering through
movements, gestures, or shouts.
The referee must remember that the opponent/goalkeeper can only be bothered if the
attacker is within his angle of vision.
It is possible for an attacker to remove himself from an offside position by visibly
stepping off the field, to show that he will not interfere with play and does not
want to gain an advantage from his offside position. Reentry into the game is possible
only after this sequence of play has ended.
If a player reenters before the current sequence has ended, the decision must be
an indirect free kick (for offside) - not a disciplinary action.
A defender may not leave the field with the intent of putting an attacker into an
offside position. In this case, the referee must decide to play on (i.e. not to
call offside).
Return to WCSC Home Page